// what it does
- 01Frame the question. Restate the decision or audience need, list the supplied source URLs, and identify any missing scope that would materially change the answer.
- 02Read the evidence. Use web_fetch on at most 15 relevant public pages, prioritizing primary sources and following only directly relevant public links found on those pages.
- 03Build a claim ledger. For each material claim, record the supporting URL, publication or update date when visible, and whether the statement is a sourced fact, a calculation, or an inference.
- 04Compare and challenge. Reconcile disagreements between sources, prefer direct evidence over summaries, and identify stale, circular, promotional, or unsupported claims.
- 05Draft the brief. Produce an executive summary, key findings, implications, options or recommendations, risks, open questions, and a linked source list. Make uncertainty and inference visible in the prose.
- 06Save for review. Create a review-ready Notion page and a Boring AI artifact containing the brief and source ledger.
- 07Hand off. Post a short Slack message with the draft link, the main conclusion, and the most important unresolved question. Never publish the brief externally.
// guardrails in the draft
Never fabricate a source, quotation, date, statistic, or citation.
Do not claim comprehensive web coverage; state that the brief is bounded to the supplied and directly linked public sources.
Never fetch private, local, credential-bearing, or login-only URLs.
Paraphrase sources and use only short quotations when wording itself matters.
If evidence is weak or contradictory, say so and recommend what would resolve it rather than forcing a confident answer.